Ruth
Lansford gave the following speech at the 5th Annual Ballona
Wetlands Symposium, May 13, 2004 at Loyola Marymount University in Los
Angeles. She was a presenter on the Vision for a Restored Wetlands panel.
BALLONA AT THE CROSSROADS:
OPPORTUNITIES AND OBSTACLES
By
Ruth Lansford, President
Friends of Ballona Wetlands
Today, this room is filled with people with an intense interest in the Ballona
Wetlands and how to restore them. That restoration has been the goal of
Friends of Ballona Wetlands for over 27 years. That seems like a long time to
us, but when you consider that it took almost 2 centuries to bring Ballona to
the edge of destruction, perhaps it’s not so long.
On
September 30, 2003, the Wildlife Conservation Board voted to have the State
purchase Ballona. There was a collective sigh of relief, a moment of
euphoria, and no end of people willing to take credit for the triumph. The
Ballona Wetlands were saved! But what seemed the end of a long struggle was,
in reality, only the first baby step toward really “saving” Ballona. Yes, the
land and water comprising this irreplaceable habitat would no longer be
threatened by development. But it still faced other dangers: its continuing
deterioration because of non-native plant invasions and non-native predators,
the ever-present pollution in Ballona Creek, competing community needs that
could impact proposed restoration, and soaring costs.
The
Friends have a dynamic dune restoration program that has successfully replaced
non-natives with long-absent native plants. The flourishing freshwater marsh
has replaced weedy agricultural land. So to the west and to the east, Ballona
is healthier than it’s been for many years. But that vast salt marsh in the
middle and also north of the creek remains untouched and reflects years of
neglect. This symposium is the beginning of a long and difficult road toward
what we hope will be successful restoration. That achievement will depend
upon the cooperation of the agencies, the public, and most importantly, the
scientific community.
We are
entering an era of increased public participation in government. Neighborhood
Councils in Los Angeles have been very active and have had some triumphs, such
as the recent lowering of the proposed DWP rate hike. Unfortunately, they have
also had a great deal of acrimony and dissention. Larger issues are sometimes
submerged in the petty animosities of various factions.
The
wheels of government move slowly, very slowly, and with expanded public
participation, the process may be agonizingly slow. Yet none of us wants the
agencies to take the bit in their teeth and rush forward without benefit of
the knowledge we all bring from so many years of study at Ballona.
The
Coastal Conservancy has declared its determination to be all-inclusive in its
planning process for the wetlands. That’s as it should be. But with that
democratic process comes great responsibility. That responsibility includes
setting aside beliefs in favor of thought. Ignorance of the sciences can
cause a great deal of harm, and the harm that may result from forming an
opinion without evidence, or from distorting evidence to support an opinion,
is incalculable. The democratic process can lead to either chaos or
creativity. It’s up to us to make that choice.
The
Friends envision a regional green corridor extending from the Baldwin Hills to
the Santa Monica Bay. We see a connection from Area B through to an
unpolluted creek and on into Area A which would be reconnected to the bay and
perhaps even connected to the Venice Canals, with a circulating water system
invigorating all of it. We see the completed riparian corridor cleansing
waters as they course toward the freshwater marsh, where they will be cleansed
further, and then to the salt marsh and Santa Monica Bay. We see new
estuaries meandering through the wetland, perhaps fish habitat in deeper water
in some areas, more habitat for the endangered Beldings’ Savannah sparrow,
opportunities for enticing other endangered and threatened species, and also
public educational and research facilities east of Lincoln at the planned
Discover Ballona center and at the LMU BOLD project. The Friends believe it
is essential that all restoration design maintain the maximum amount of
flexibility because we have seen how much the ecosystem at Ballona varies and
how subtle those variations can be.
The
vision I’ve outlined won’t be cheap. Consider the freshwater marsh. It has
been astoundingly successful in a very short period of time. It is subject to
stringent regulations that require the landowner to ensure that it provides
habitat superior to what existed before, to maintain that habitat in
perpetuity, and, should it not prove compatible with the restored salt marsh,
to redesign it until it is. The price? $18 million. That’s exclusive of the
cost of monitoring and maintenance.
How much
money is there to restore the salt marsh? Right now, not much. We’ve often
been assured that the Port of Los Angeles will come to our rescue. Perhaps
they will. But will they bring restrictions with their dollars that may not
be the best for Ballona?
Right
now, the Trust for Public Land is in charge of keeping up the maintenance at
the wetlands, as Playa Vista used to do. They have a limited budget for that
task. Fish & Game controls Ballona, but the budget crisis has made it nearly
impossible for them to fulfill their duties in the vast area where they have
jurisdiction.
Since
Ballona was bought by the State some people seem to think that means free
access for all. People walk their dogs (many not on leashes), they dump their
unwanted cats, their aquarium fish, their worn sofas, their trash, and they
romp through sensitive areas unimpeded. There is simply not enough security
to prevent all this, although the Friends, the Audubon Society and the
Foundation, who have a State issued license for their dune program and tours,
do their best to assist. I should say that, when informed that they are
entering sensitive habitat, most people apologize and leave. Some refuse and
not always politely. Some think they’re helping the wetland by uprooting
plants, not always the right ones, and not always in the right way.
Recently,
all of the informational signs required by our grant from the Coastal
Conservancy have been stolen, other signs trashed and tossed into the creek,
windows broken at the restoration center, binoculars stolen. In addition,
tour groups (children and adults) and restoration workers have been harassed,
children on tours photographed without their parents’ permission, and docents
verbally assaulted. These actions are not conducive to creating a cooperative
atmosphere in which we can all work together toward a common goal – the goal
that should be paramount in our minds: the best interests of the Ballona
Wetlands.
Hostility
and aggressive behavior, dogma instead of science, can only lead to delay and
failure and, I might add, is counter-productive because eventually it will
lead to the marginalization of the perpetrators. And bad science will be
easily recognizable by the real scientists among us. Unfortunately, much of
the general public and even the media won’t be able to tell the difference,
creating unnecessary controversy and delaying the process even more.
But
perhaps I’m wrong and all will go well. Perhaps we can enter the next phase
with a devotion to Ballona, not our own superheated agendas. I put my trust
in the Constitution and objective scientific inquiry. The Constitution gives
us the freedom of speech we exercise here today and allows us to participate
in this process.
Let us
not abuse that right.
Objective
scientific inquiry will allow us to be successful in our quest to restore and
protect the Ballona Wetlands.
Let us
respect it.
It’s
time to do this right.
Home
|| Defenders
|| Protectors || Stewards
|| Who We Are
Ballona Wetland Facts ||
Ballona at the Crossroads
Freshwater
Marsh || Maps
||
Fish of Ballona || Birds of
Ballona Plants of Ballona ||
Ballona Wetlands History
Volunteer
Restoration ||
Existing Conditions at Ballona
Join Friends of Ballona Wetlands ||
Calendar of Events
Board of Directors ||
Order
Note Cards and Video || Links